Research:Modelling rule Person vs Organization vs HeritageObject
Person, Organisation and HeritageObject – Modelling Rules
Purpose
This page explains the conceptual difference between:
- Person
- Organisation
- HeritageObject
These three entities represent fundamentally different types of things.
Clearly separating them is essential to keep the data model consistent and avoid confusion.
Core principle
When entering data, always ask:
Is this a person, a group of people, or a physical thing?
The answer determines which entity must be used.
Definitions
Person
A single individual human being.
Examples:
- architect
- priest
- sister
- mayor
- soldier
- photographer
- witness
- owner
Typical attributes:
- birth date
- death date
- biography
- roles
- nationality
Rule:
Use Person ONLY for one individual.
Organisation
A group or collection of people acting together as one entity.
Examples:
- Congregation of Sisters of Charity
- hospital staff
- parish council
- Red Cross
- heritage club
- municipality
- fire brigade
- school board
- religious order
These are:
- not one person
- not a physical object
- but still actors
Typical attributes:
- name
- type (association, order, service, etc.)
- founding date
- mission/description
Rule:
Use Organisation for any collective or group of persons.
HeritageObject
A physical object, building, site or construction.
Examples:
- church building
- bunker
- farmhouse
- bridge
- lighthouse
- monument
- cemetery
- statue
- ruin
These are things that:
- exist physically
- have a location
- can be photographed
- can be measured or restored
Typical attributes:
- coordinates
- construction date
- materials
- condition
- protection status
Rule:
Use HeritageObject only for tangible, physical things.
Why this separation is important
Mixing these concepts causes serious modelling problems.
For example:
If a person were stored as a HeritageObject:
- why would a person have coordinates?
- why would a person have construction year?
If a building were stored as a Person:
- why would it have a birth date?
- why would it have a biography?
Such mixing leads to:
- meaningless fields
- inconsistent data
- difficult queries
- confusion for users
Therefore the three concepts must remain strictly separated.
Typical grey cases
Statue of a person
Not a person.
It is a physical object.
→ HeritageObject (type = statue)
Grave or tomb
Not a person.
It is a physical site.
→ HeritageObject (type = grave or monument)
Congregation of sisters
Not one individual.
It is a group.
→ Organisation
Hospital staff
Not a building, not one person.
→ Organisation
Architect who designed a church
Two separate entities:
- Person: the architect
- HeritageObject: the church
Relation:
church → designed by → person
Never merge them.
Relationships between entities
The model becomes powerful when relations are used:
Examples:
- HeritageObject → designed by → Person
- HeritageObject → owned by → Organisation
- HeritageObject → operated by → Organisation
- Organisation → located in → Place
- Person → member of → Organisation
This allows rich historical descriptions while keeping entities clean.
Simple rule for club members
If unsure, remember:
Person = WHO Organisation = GROUP OF WHO HeritageObject = WHAT
This rule is usually sufficient to decide correctly.
Conclusion
Always use:
- Person for individuals
- Organisation for groups
- HeritageObject for physical things
Never mix these categories.
This separation keeps:
- the database clean
- forms simple
- queries reliable
- and the system maintainable long term.